
Perspectives and Challenges for the Study of Brain Responses to Coaching: Enhancing the Dialogue between the Fields of Neuroscience and Coaching Psychology By Gisele Pereira Dias, Stephen Palmer, Siobhain O’Riordan, Sabrina Bastos de Freitas, Leonardo Rosa Habib, Mário Cesar do Nascimento Bevilaqua & Antonio Egidio Nardi in The Coaching Psychologist, Vol. 11, No. 1, June 2015 11; The British Psychological Society – ISSN: 1748–1104
Abstract from the authors:The interest in coaching psychology and neuroscience has been steadily increasing over the past 15 years. However, the two fields have not yet established consistent dialogues underpinned by experimental research. This paper highlights the importance of such dialogue for the growth of evidence-based coaching and how coaching psychology could benefit from previous neuroimaging and electroencephalographic studies in the field of psychotherapy and task-specific brain functioning to design research protocols that could significantly contribute to our understanding of how coaching works at the brain level and how coachees could best achieve results.
Response to Dias et al.: Coaching the brain: Neuro-science or neuro nonsense? Anthony M. Grant in The Coaching Psychologist, Vol. 11, No. 1, June 2015
Abstract from the author:This paper discusses some myths and misconceptions that have emerged in relation to neuroscience and coaching, and explores the notion that neuroscience provides a foundational evidence-base for coaching, and that neurocoaching is a unique or original coaching methodology. It is found that much of the insights into coaching purported to be delivered by neuroscience are long-established within the behavioral sciences. Furthermore, the empirical and conceptual links between neuroscientific findings and actual coaching practice are tenuous at best. Although at present there is no convincing empirical support for a neuroscientific foundation to coaching, there are important ways in which coaching and neuroscience can interact…. It may well be that coaching can be of greater use to the field of neuroscience than the field of neuroscience can be to coaching. In this way, we can address many neuromyths and misconceptions about brain-based coaching, and begin to author a more accurate and productive narrative about the relationship between coaching and neuroscience.